Rate this post


Cannabiz Media has been tracking marijuana and hemp licenses for five years. When we 1st launched our database to the public in 2016, there have been a quantity of states that supplied varying amounts of information connected to cannabis licenses. Washington was and remains the leader in dissemination of license information as they give significantly a lot more detail than any other jurisdiction.

As we move into 2019, Cannabiz Media now covers a combined 82 jurisdictions for cannabis and hemp in the US and Canada, and in quite a few circumstances, we track several regulators in every single and every single state.

The heavily regulated cannabis industry, for the most element, has designed a great deal of license information supplied so , stakeholders can be confident , they are having treated fairly.  On the other hand, the jurisdictions outlined beneath have been significantly significantly less than forthcoming in creating information supplied.

Arizona

According to the Arizona Division of All round well being Options, you can not find the location of any cannabis establishment unless you have a well being-associated marijuana card:

Unless you are a registered qualifying patient who is not authorized to cultivate marijuana plants for well being-associated use, the Division can not give you with a list of dispensaries. The Arizona Healthcare Marijuana Act, A.R.S. § 36-2810 (A.), states that information received and records kept by the Division for the purposes of administering the Act, like “the physical addresses of nonprofit well being-associated marijuana dispensaries”, are confidential. On the other hand, A.R.S. § 36-2804.04(C) demands the Division to give a list of registered dispensaries to a qualifying patient who is not authorized to cultivate marijuana plants when issuing the qualifying patient’s registry identification card.

This is most probably the most intense instance of sustaining information from the public. Locating licensed cultivators or suppliers in Arizona is even tougher than discovering dispensaries.

Nevada

As reported in the Nevada Independent, the Nevada Division of Taxation is asking marijuana firms to voluntarily let the state reveal no matter regardless of whether they have been granted a conditional license to open one particular specific or significantly a lot more dispensaries and how their application ranked rather than just creating the information public.

The move comes right away immediately after the division received criticism for the secretive nature of the marijuana licensing process. At least one particular specific firm whose applications have been rejected has sued the state, questioning how some applicants received licenses when they scored substantially lessen than the firm in a preceding application period.

Taxation officials have so far declined to release other information about the winning applicants, citing a marijuana regulation that states “the Division will and any designee of the Division shall retain the confidentiality of and shall not disclose the name or any other identifying information of any specific particular person who facilitates or delivers options pursuant to this chapter.”

But the division released a list of scores for applications they received in every single and every single jurisdiction — with the applicant names redacted — and spokeswoman Stephanie Klapstein described the division will reveal the names when and if the applicant returns the consent type.

Critics have dismissed the confidentiality as unnecessary, saying it is a misinterpretation of a regulation that was intended to shield well being-associated marijuana sufferers.

Pennsylvania

While Nevada asked the license winners for their permission to share information, Pennsylvania went even extra by enabling the applicants to self-redact their individual filings!

As reported in Pennlive, The division initially permitted grower / processor and dispensary applicants to self-redact what they regarded as proprietary information on a copy of the application they submitted to the division. In addition, the division designed some of its individual redactions. The process, nonetheless, resulted in tiny consistency from one particular specific applicant to the subsequent.

For some applicants, the public could not inform who will run the operations or who’s funding every single and every single operation. In at least one particular specific case, the applicant redacted the name of the firm itself.

Missouri

Missouri officials described lately that significantly a lot more than $3 million in well being-associated marijuana license fees have been paid mainly because the state began accepting pre-filed applications a month ago. They proudly tout that 418 “pre-filed application forms” have been sent in, accompanied by a total of $3,020,000 in fees.

The totals incorporate:

  • 226 forms for dispensary facilities
  • 128 forms for cultivation facilities and
  • 64 forms for infused-item manufacturing facilities

The state has repeatedly declined to make that information public even right away immediately after having Freedom of Info and details Act requests. In their request denial to the News-Leader, the DHSS spokeswoman explained the option by saying that the division will “continue to stand behind our interpretation of the Quick report XVI Section 1.3(5) of the Missouri Constitution.” That section of Amendment two demands DHSS to “maintain the confidentiality of reports or other information obtained from an applicant or licensee.”

Backers of Amendment two have described that provision of the legal text is not meant to shield the identities of organization-connected well being-associated marijuana license applicants from public disclosure. Like Nevada, the regulator has chosen a very distinct view of a regulation to favor applicants.

Colorado

Lastly, Colorado initially designed information supplied to the Denver Post and then wanted tens of thousands of dollars to release the quite identical information a year later. The Post criticized the regulator for treating the cannabis industry so differently just mainly because specifics on other sate licensed industries and occupations is supplied.

At that point, the state had been creating information supplied about the enterprises themselves but not the persons who owned them. They also stopped creating supplied information on state disciplinary actions against a marijuana organization

The Denver Post did at some point prevail and the regulator created a approach for the public to investigation this material on the world-wide-web – one particular specific license at a time.

Tracking Cannabis Licenses

Not all states are complex to deal with. Some location a lot of time and energy into creating information supplied to help stakeholders know who is element of the industry. Examples of robust states incorporate Alaska, Massachusetts and California.

Cannabiz Media is now tracking a lot more than 40,000 licenses across these 82 jurisdictions in the Cannabiz Media License Database, and you will be capable to continue to rely on us to sort by means of these regulatory nightmares to bring full, timely and precise license information to your advertising and sales efforts.